Deep state and the control of all media

In a hypothetical scenario where a deep state seeks to control a newly established world order, it would indeed make sense for them to target social media companies like Twitter and Telegram if these platforms are perceived as uncontrollable or counter to their interests. Here’s why:

Information Control: Social media platforms are powerful tools for shaping public opinion, spreading information, and organizing movements. If these platforms are outside the deep state’s control, they could be used to disseminate information that undermines their authority or exposes their agenda.

Censorship and Narrative Management: A deep state would likely aim to suppress dissent and control the narrative. If platforms like Twitter and Telegram resist censorship or allow free speech that contradicts the desired narrative, they could be seen as threats. Attacking or discrediting these platforms could be a way to stifle unwanted narratives.

Security Concerns: Telegram, in particular, is known for its strong encryption and privacy features, which can make it a haven for those communicating outside of state surveillance. If the deep state cannot monitor or infiltrate these communications, the platform would be considered a security risk.

Destabilizing Trust: Attacking these platforms could take many forms, including cyber attacks, disinformation campaigns, legal pressures, or financial sanctions. The goal would be to destabilize trust in the platforms, disrupt their services, or force them to comply with control measures.

Alternative Platforms: If the deep state promotes alternative platforms that they can control or influence, undermining popular but uncontrollable platforms would also serve to drive users toward these state-approved alternatives, consolidating their control over information flow.

This strategy would fit within broader tactics of authoritarian or controlling regimes that prioritize information dominance as a means of maintaining power and control over societies.